Enquirer Consulting Group

Reachable Buyer Map

Prepared for Louis Lemieux · changeforce · August 2026
Here is the map. Change and organizational work has a buyer that only exists above a size line, and a trigger that is an event rather than a season. Below a few hundred people there is no head of change, so the work lands on the CEO by default. This page covers where the buyer does exist, who signs inside each segment, and roughly how many employers sit there. It describes the market, not your firm, and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.
Manufacturers and industrial operators
The largest single block above the size line, and the one where change work arrives disguised as something else: a plant consolidation, a new line, a safety record, a shift pattern nobody will defend out loud. Frequently owner-led or sponsor-owned, and rarely competed for by firms that arrive through a conference stage.
Who signs: the COO or VP of operations, the CHRO or single senior HR leader, the plant president on site-level work.
6,000 to 6,500
US manufacturing employers at 250 people or more, of which roughly 1,800 sit at 1,000 and up
Health systems and care organizations
The heaviest concentration of workforce problems in the country and the sector most willing to treat retention, culture and clinical outcomes as one conversation. Buying cycles are long and committee led, and the work recurs once it lands, which makes the first engagement worth more than it looks.
Who signs: CHRO, chief nursing officer, chief transformation officer, VP of clinical operations.
5,800 to 6,200
US health care and social assistance employers at 250 people or more
Financial services and insurance
The segment most likely to have a funded transformation office already, which cuts both ways. The internal team exists, so the conversation is not about capability, it is about the piece an internal team cannot do to itself. It is also the segment where a merger reorders the org chart fastest.
Who signs: COO, chief transformation officer, head of change management, CHRO, and the group CEO on integration work.
2,700 to 3,000
US finance and insurance employers at 250 people or more; roughly 1,000 of them at 1,000 and up
Professional services, agencies and consultancies
Firms whose entire asset walks out at six in the evening, which is why people work gets bought here early and personally. Worth naming a limit: agency groups usually file under a holding entity rather than the brand you would recognize, so the count alongside understates the reachable brands inside it.
Who signs: the managing partner or CEO, the chief people officer, the COO, and the group people director at holding level.
4,200 to 4,500
US professional, scientific and technical employers at 250 people or more; roughly 150 of them registered as advertising and public relations firms
Education and higher education
A segment where the public data lies by omission. State and public institutions do not appear in the private-employer filings this page is built from, so the countable layer is the private and independent one only. The real reachable set in higher education is materially larger than the figure alongside, and it is worked by name rather than by list.
Who signs: the provost or chief of staff, the vice president for human resources, the chief operating officer, the dean on faculty-facing work.
Roughly 1,300 countable at 250 or more
private education employers only; public institutions are absent from this data entirely
Corporate parents and holding companies
Small by count and disproportionately valuable, because the decision sits with people who own several operating businesses at once and buy the same work repeatedly. It is also where merger and separation decisions are actually made, one level above the company that feels them.
Who signs: the group CEO, the operating partner, the chief of staff, the group people director, the head of corporate development.
450 to 550
US management and holding entities at 250 people or more; deliberately a narrow, high-value list

Where the openings are

1
The size line is the whole targeting problem, and it is knowable. Roughly 26,000 to 27,000 US employers sit between 250 and 999 people, and roughly 11,500 to 12,000 sit at 1,000 and up. The first band buys change work from the CEO because there is nobody else to buy it. The second band buys it from a named function. Same service, two entirely different opening lines, and most outreach picks one and sends it to both.
2
The trigger is an event, and events are visible from outside. In the most recent published filing year, roughly 700 to 800 US employers at 250 people or more registered a brand new employee benefit plan. That is what a carve-out, a newly separated entity or a post-merger consolidation looks like from the outside, and it shows up months before anyone in that building calls a consultant. Watching several thousand companies for that signal is a mechanical job, and it is the one thing a referral channel structurally cannot do.
3
Your three lines do not share one buyer. Organizational effectiveness sits with the COO. People and organization sits with the CHRO. Merger and acquisition work sits with corporate development or the group CEO, one level above both of them. A single channel tends to keep knocking on whichever door answered last time, so two of the three lines stay quietly under-sold.
4
This is a distribution gap, not a credibility one. Diagnosing why an organization resists a change is your discipline and you do not need help with it. What is missing is the machinery that puts the firm in front of several thousand named COOs, CHROs and group CEOs who have never heard of it, on a schedule, and tracks what comes back. That is the part we design, staff and run, and then hand over.
Built from public registries, counts banded deliberately. The source is the federal employee benefit plan filings covering US private-sector employers, current to the 2024 filing year. Headcount bands use plan participants as a proxy, so they indicate scale rather than an exact staff count. Owner-only and very small employers are not published, public-sector institutions are absent entirely, and sector codes are self-reported.
ENQUIRER CONSULTING GROUP
enquirerconsulting.com